twitter youtube facebook linkedin email
Connect with:

BIM and Beam

“Structural Engineering – open that!” It was exciting to hear the droid K-2 say these words in the film Star Wars Rogue One last winter. If you recall, this was the scene where Jyn and Cassian were frantically searching for the Death Star plans at the Citadel Tower’s data vault.  As a former practicing structural engineer, I saw this as a short but proud moment for all of us to be in the limelight. After the movie ended, however, I couldn’t help but wonder how many other people in the theater understood what K-2’s exclamation meant.  I mean, other than fellow engineers, does anyone else realize how important structural engineering is to the world?

Death Star plans

Does anyone outside the engineering community understand how important structural engineering is for projects like the Death Star? (Wookiepedia)

As I meet with customers around the globe, I often get asked how important structural analysis is to Autodesk. I also get asked to share information about the trends and innovations that are shaping our structural engineering offering.

I can tell you that both—the structural engineering industry and the topic of structural analysis in particular —are very important to us at Autodesk. In my role, I am fortunate to see the amazing ways that Autodesk customers are innovating and shaping the future. While technology is rapidly changing how structural engineers do their jobs, certain trends are clear. I’d like to share with you some of these trends and how they will change structural analysis and related technologies in the future. After reading this post, you should have a good grasp of what the future could look like for structural analysis.

A “partner + build” approach for structural analysis

If we look back in time, Autodesk’s approach to delivering structural analysis has been a pragmatic one, using both technology partnerships and in-house solutions. As BIM adoption started to grow in the early 2000s, we formed several technology partnerships with leading providers of 3D analysis software. Since then, numerous integrations with Revit have been created across the globe (see here for a past article talking about our integrations with analysis partners). These integrations have helped engineers better coordinate their structural designs when collaborating on BIM projects.

Delivering in-house structural analysis has also been an important part of our offering. Investing in our Robot Structural Analysis (RSA) business has given us access to thousands of customers doing structural analysis on a range of project types world-wide. It also helped us deliver the first cloud-based, BIM-centric structural analysis solution to the industry. We believe these different in-house solutions, along with partner solutions, have helped engineering teams adopt BIM more quickly and with greater productivity.

Robot Structural Analysis

Robot Structural Analysis software provides engineers with advanced BIM-integrated analysis and design tools to understand the behavior of any structure type and verify code compliance.

Looking ahead, I see structural engineers continuing to expect pragmatic, open approaches from technology providers delivering structural analysis. However, the way these solutions are delivered to customers will be shaped by evolving trends and challenges facing the industry. Let’s now explore these trends in a bit more detail.

The role of Structural Engineers will change

In one of my recent posts about Engineering Trends of the Future, I talk about a future where structural engineers are affected by several macro-economic, institutional and technology trends. I want to highlight two of these trends which I think are the most important:

  • Growing project complexity will require engineers to be better communicators and problem solvers. This will require greater coordination between specialists for various building components and materials. It will also require the use of more powerful computational modeling tools to explore and design a greater number of solutions more quickly. This trend alone will require engineers to have stronger skill sets in advanced analysis and new design methodologies like performance-based design.
  • The globalization of teams will create access to a global pool of engineering professionals that can collaborate on projects.  It will be fueled by a demand for a more skilled, domestic engineering workforce. To use this new engineering capacity, teams will need to organize, delegate and manage engineering tasks by level of complexity.

These industry trends, along with technology advancements, will require teams to problem-solve in new ways. To manage such a broad range of specialized tasks and remain competitive, engineers will need to focus on higher value tasks while automating or outsourcing lower-value tasks.

This vision is shared by David Odeh, CEO of Odeh Engineers and current President of the Structural Engineering Institute. David also sees a future where engineers embrace the automation of simple tasks to come and rise to the occasion to focus on higher value tasks, “…the same automated power that reduces the need for tedious engineering calculations also enables the analysis of more design options, more complex structures, and more resilient structures. And structural engineers are the professionals best suited for those demanding tasks.” This is echoed by a recent interview with Dr. Jerome F. Hajjar, PhD, PE, CDM Smith professor and department chair of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Boston’s Northeastern University.  Dr. Hajjar takes it a step further, and discusses a future where engineers also provide value by focusing on sustainability and resilience—not just a response to hazard events.

As engineers focus on designing more sustainable and resilient structures, technology such as drones, reality capture, and sensing technologies will help engineers provide higher value services that better measure and assess as-built building performance.  A great example of this today is provided by Sensequake. Sensequake’s specific application combines their software technology with sensor hardware to help engineers and building owners use real, physical building characteristics to better predict structural performance during an earthquake. It also helps owners more quickly assess damage of a building after an earthquake by using sensor technology instead of costly forensic studies.   CEO Farshad Mirshafiei, PhD explains it in more detail:

“Sensequake technology can be used for seismic and time history analysis. 3D-SAM software can quickly run time history analysis on as many ground motions as needed and provides you with response histories and maximum global seismic demands solely based on sensing results without making any finite element model.”

Sensequake is the future of structural analysis

This is a great example of how BIM, IoT and the power of the cloud computing will help engineers deliver high value services to their clients in the future. They will do this in a way that continues to make them relevant and competitive. You can learn more about what Sensequake is doing here, but I, along with others, see this as the future of the industry and the beginning of how structural engineers will find relevance in an increasingly automated future.

Changing expectations around structural analysis

As you can imagine, these macro trends are already beginning to impact our industry. As I’ve met with structural engineers over the past couple of years, I see a shift happening where firms are feeling pressures to differentiate their services. To adapt, they must automate out the routine analysis and design activities which are non-differentiating. These pressures are also redefining the expectations from structural analysis providers. I see a trend where engineering firms will expect increases in productivity for both high-value and low-value design activities. I see this impacting software makers in 4 areas:

  • Simplicity – There is a rising expectation for AEC software to be easier to use and interact with, just like our smartphones and 3D gaming technology. Our future structural engineers are using Minecraft today and will want to use modern, easy to use analysis software in the future.
  • Customization – Engineers have challenged us to reimagine structural design (code-checking) within a BIM-centric workflow, placing a strong emphasis on flexibility and transparency. You can call this a requirement to “open the black box.” I estimate that over half of all structural calculations are done using Excel. A big reason for this is the high level of transparency using spreadsheets.
  • Optimization – The growing use of computational design is allowing engineers to explore a greater number of design options in less time. Coupled with the assistance of generative design algorithms and even machine learning, engineers will be able to study more design options more deeply than ever before.
  • Automation – As more structural engineers adopt BIM, they will want to streamline much of the simpler analysis and design tasks as much as possible. Technologists must integrate all steps in the design process including design exploration, structural analysis, code-based design and detailing automation all in one. We are seeing some evidence of this consolidation by the number of technology partners now building analysis and design solutions directly on Revit that also automate detailing.

The demand for greater Simplicity described above has been on the rise for several years now. In fact, this was a big driver for us to release the React Structures Technical Preview in 2015. The strong interest from engineers in React validated the need for a more modern, easier to use structural analysis software that connects to BIM.   However, to deliver upon all four areas, a unique technology approach is needed and I believe that is Connected BIM. Connected BIM for structural analysis means centralizing the design process around BIM and the cloud. Let me explain this in a bit more detail.

A Connected Future of Structural Analysis and BIM

We are seeing increasing demand for BIM-centric, cloud based structural analysis especially in Europe. I would like to share with you how Autodesk, and its ecosystem of technology partners, are helping customers today do structural analysis using BIM and the cloud.

BIM-centric structural analysis and design

As engineers expect structural analysis to be more BIM-based, I see our analysis and design partners leading the way here.  Partners are providing solutions today on top of Revit to streamline analysis, design and detailing for many different materials.   For example, SOFiSTiK, and Graitec provide design-driven detailing automation for concrete rebar on Revit.  We have IDEARS and RISA Technologies providing steel connection design on Revit. We also have StrucSoft delivering BIM-based structural analysis, design and detailing of timber and cold-formed steel structures. And, finally, AGACAD, StruSoft and PTAC’s Revit^EDGE deliver precast design to detailing on Revit.

Autodesk is encouraging more partners to take this approach—especially with structural analysis— and, if the trend above continues, we see a future where structural analysis and design technologies will become less siloed and more ubiquitous with BIM.

Cloud-based analysis and design

Structural analysis in the cloud has quietly been growing adoption in recent years. With Autodesk releasing Structural Analysis for Revit several years ago, I see a number of start-ups now delivering cloud-based structural analysis and design services to structural engineers across the globe.

Structural Analysis for Revit

Autodesk Structural Analysis for Revit enables structural engineers to conduct analysis in the cloud as a part of the BIM process. With Structural Analysis, engineers and designers can extend design models from Revit directly to the cloud helping to minimize disruptions to workflow and allowing users to continue to design as analysis is completed. Once the analysis is conducted, results can then be visualized and explored within Revit.

Here at Autodesk, we are seeing a lot of development on our cloud platform, called Forge. Forge enables Autodesk and its ecosystem of partners to provide services in a new way that enables Connected BIM. A great example of partners using Forge is how IDEARS is using it to develop connection design documentation in the cloud from Revit and Advance Steel.

Specifically for structural analysis, I see several benefits for connecting structural analysis and design using the cloud. I would like to share 3 of them with you including some examples of each:

  • Faster design exploration  Design will combine generative design algorithms with analysis, code-based design plus other simulation engines that capture new design factors like resilience and sustainability. To imagine what this could look like for structural engineers, I recommend that you look at Autodesk’s Project Dreamcatcher or read about project Quantum as envisioned by Amar Hanspal at last year’s Autodesk University. Down the road, I expect to see generative design services popping up that will help engineers better optimize their designs around code requirements and even constructability.
  • Faster QA/QC – Automation of routine analysis and checking will allow quality review tasks to be performed more quickly.   An example of this is a service provided by BIM Assure. This software performs model checking of Revit models on the cloud. Though it doesn’t perform code-based structural design checks, it provides a great example of what is possible with cloud-based model checking at the BIM object level.
  • Open-source customization  Open APIs combined with visual programming interfaces will open the “black box” of analytical model frameworks and code-based design rule engines. You are already seeing these tools available from Autodesk as desktop apps. Structural Analysis for Dynamo shows over 5000 downloads from structural analysis customers interested in further integrating RSA and Revit through Dynamo. I envision demand for similar cloud-based apps in the future.

You can see that structural analysis connected to BIM and the cloud will reshape the future of how structures are analyzed and designed. A Connected BIM approach to structural analysis is key for technology providers to address the changing expectations from engineers.

Tell us what you think

I hope I’ve given you some insight into what the Connected BIM future holds for structural engineers, and how Autodesk’s vision of structural analysis will help you better prepare for the future to come.

So what does this mean for you as structural engineers practicing today? What types of technologies should you be investing in now to prepare you for the future?

Firstly, Robot Structural Analysis continues to be an integral and viable part of Autodesk’s structural engineering portfolio. It is a great option for customers that need robust analysis and code based design that connect to BIM.   Engineers can also explore using Structural Analysis for Revit to perform more early stage analyses like load-take-down studies.  Secondly, for engineers using other structural analysis solutions, they can also integrate those solutions into their BIM workflow. These two paths align with our pragmatic approach of delivering structural analysis using both in-house developed technology and through partnership.

What do you think? Do you agree with me? Does our approach make sense to you?  We’d love to have you share your feedback with us by taking the short survey below and posting your questions and feedback in the comments. We’ll be monitoring them and responding.

Take the survey.

Featured Links

Michael Gustafson

Michael is currently Senior Industry Strategy Manager for Structural Engineering, responsible for establishing long-term Industry Strategy for structural analysis, design, detailing and fabrication with Autodesk. Michael practiced structural engineering at Ellerbe Becket and holds a BS and MS from the University of Minnesota, and an MBA from Michael J. Coles College of Business.


View by:
Most Recent Oldest
  1. Pingback: How Technology-enabled Collaboration Will Streamline Engineering – Synergen

  2. AvatarSerhanB



    Dear Michael,
    this is a very well “structured” article that I’ve read lately regarding str. analysis and design of near future. You summarized now and give a glimpse of future in brilliant way. I’ve been thinking about same topics with the blaze of latest improvements in software and AI algorithms. I believe the role of structural engineers will not change but expand.

    The introduction of BIM raised the inter-disciplinary coordination to a level much more higher than before. By now engineers need to be more involved in the process and be more knowledgeable of mep systems and architectural aspects. Especially for high complexity buildings and models, structural designers both need to be very well proficient in operating a bunch of BIM software as well as being competent in their fields. I also see that draftsmanship is slowly becoming obsolete, next generation soon will be just modelers and bim technicians.

    While the all kinds of software is becoming smarter, more and more easy to use I guess again the role of engineers will not change in near future. The trend of making structural software complicated in terms of analysis capabilities is slowly transforming into hiding/keeping the complexity in lower levels but rather providing a lean interface to the user. Maybe design optimization, cloud analysis and machine learning will take structural analysis to become statistical analysis where most of the possible design options be solved already who knows. Even though reaching that point and afterwards str. engineers role will evolve but not be superseded.

    By now Revit and Robot is the well matched couple in terms of connected future. With the power brought together by API capabilities and add-ins, integrated BIM process is becoming more of a standard already. Forge is also a very smart platform that provides cloud capabilities and powers to developers. I see in every cycle of releases that these software and services slightly merging and becoming more powerful and smarter than previous.

    Although the future seems exciting with all of this development in a very short time there is still room for improvement in current versions. Like Revit analytical modeling to become easier and smarter, Robot mesh algorithms to be more robust and fast, integration tool to become smarter like auto translating unordinary section shapes etc.

    The one thing that I can not pass without mentioning (in a world where the machine learning and AI is the hype) is LISP. AutoCAD took that chance to use the power of such an incredible tool built-in to its core. Being a long time lisp coder, I didn’t see the robustness of lisp neither in pyhton or c#. Dynamo is also fun to use but none of these languages can reach to the IQ that Lisp can bring in to the game. I do not expect but really wish to see Lisp being integrated into Revit as well.

    Thanks once more for your great article that made us think about the exciting future!




    Excellent article on providing a high level view of the present and possible future of structural analysis software. I read the last paragraph regarding Robot Structural Analysis, and see RSA as still a solution.If possible could you elaborate on what we should expect in the near future for Robot. We are based on North America, currently use RISA and Robot for our analysis. In our BIM workflow we use both Revit, and Inventor for projects that require LOD4, the problem we are encountering is that RISA does an excellent job of updating the code checking availability in their software, and providing a link to Revit ,but does not connect to Inventor in a seamless way like Robot Structural does. Robot usefulness for Structural Engineering in North America is limited because of lack of support to provide the latest code check availability, steel connection to comply with AISC , current wind load analysis. RSA is an excellent product, but currently does not seem to be getting the support necessary to make all its functionality available to SE in the US. Any comments on the emphasis Autodesk would put on making RSA more capable for Structural Analysis in the US would be highly appreciated and welcomed




    It is quite clear the ongoing advances in technology and growing project complexities are increasingly driving engineers to challenge traditional design envelopes. Couple that with pressure of globalisation and the needs and benefits of robust collaboration platforms like Autodesk BIM 360 and you have all the ingredients to fuel dynamic change.

    The resultant paradigm shift will move the structural engineering community through an inevitable evolution, and on to a new ERA where the role of Structural Engineers naturally adapts to become more BIM focused and the adoption of BIM centric workflows becomes the norm.

    I quite agree with several sentences from your article:
    – “While technology is rapidly changing so will how structural engineers do their jobs.”
    – “These integrations have helped engineers better coordinate their structural designs when collaborating on BIM projects.”
    – “The role of Structural Engineers will change”
    – “We see a future where structural analysis and design technologies will become less siloed and more ubiquitous with BIM”.

    The future is clear and that’s why the GRAITEC structural team, have worked hard to develop our BIM Designer series of Revit® add-ons, which can automate design-driven 3D rebar cages based on Revit® results packages. This helps engineers to improve Data & Project management as well as optimising the cost and constructability of projects.

    The next logical step we foresee is to move technology to utilise the Autodesk Cloud where engineers will be able to truly take advantage of the extensive power of Autodesk Cloud computing and can quickly work through multiple design scenarios to achieve the optimal design.

    That coupled with our adaptive technology (which can run inside or outside a Revit® platform), will help the transition away from traditional yesteryear practices to the real connected BIM workflows of tomorrow, whilst enabling the consolidation of data with the Revit model.

    Thanks for a great article and sharing how you foresee the imminent changes to Structural Analysis workflows.

    1. Michael GustafsonMichael Gustafson (Post author)



      Thanks for sharing further insight.

  5. AvatarRomanich



    Could you please tell us more specifically regarding the future of RSA?

    1. Michael GustafsonMichael Gustafson (Post author)



      Please see the comment added near the end of the blog above.

  6. Pingback: Re-engineering structural analysis for the future | Shannon Smith LLC